‘Nature’s mirror’: Climate change batters Albania’s butterflies

‘Nature’s mirror’: Climate change batters Albania’s butterflies
Increasingly absent from the picturesque district of Zvernec, the Alexanor is one of 58 of the Balkan country’s 207 butterfly species that researchers say are at risk. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 20 June 2024
Follow

‘Nature’s mirror’: Climate change batters Albania’s butterflies

‘Nature’s mirror’: Climate change batters Albania’s butterflies

VLORA: Bright yellow, black, red and blue, Alexanor butterflies once fluttered abundantly on southwestern Albania’s flowery slopes. Now, like many related species, scientists say they are disappearing due to human impacts, including climate change.
Increasingly absent from the picturesque district of Zvernec, the Alexanor is one of 58 of the Balkan country’s 207 butterfly species that researchers say are at risk.
“Sensitive to changes, they are a true mirror of the conditions of the ecosystem in which they live,” said Anila Paparisto, an entomologist at Tirana University.
In Zvernec, Paparisto leads a team of researchers and students working to identify the country’s remaining butterfly species along with those that are now extinct.
Numerous scientific studies have measured the impact of climate change on butterfly populations, though researchers also cite other environmental factors.
They blame a combination of rapid urbanization, pesticides and warming temperatures for the decrease.
“Human activity and climate change have had major impacts on nature,” said biology student Fjona Skenderi, who was helping conduct research in Zvernec.
In the nearby Divjaka Natural Park, Albanian agronomist Altin Hila points to the disappearance of the Giant Peacock Moth and the Plain Tiger as another worrying sign.
“It’s a disaster marked by climatic disruptions, an early spring and excessively high temperatures in January and February,” explained Hila, who is also a passionate collector and oversees a butterfly museum in Divjaka.
“It encouraged the eggs to hatch and the butterfly larvae to grow, but in April the temperatures were too low” for them to survive, he added.

The butterflies’ decline also affects other species.
“It will impact the entire food chain and biodiversity, which is also essential for humans,” Paparisto said.
“When there are fewer butterflies, you expect... the butterfly effect.”
Like large swaths of Albania, coastal areas near Zvernec have become increasingly overrun with resorts and apartment blocks, built with little oversight.
Scientists say the rapid urbanization in the area, along with overfishing and climate change, has also played a part in the dramatic drop in migratory bird populations.
And while some butterfly populations are in decline, other similar species are prospering — to the detriment of the environment.
The arrival of a non-native moth through imports of ornamental plants from China has ravaged more than 80 percent of Albania’s boxwood forests since 2019, according to experts.
“It is very aggressive, it can reproduce three to four times a year, and it is a real misfortune which reduces entire areas to nothing,” said forest engineer Avdulla Diku.
With their distinct neon green and black bodies, the larvae are easily spotted when clinging to the boxwoods’ leaves and stems.
On the road along Lake Ohrid to Pogradec in northwestern Albania, the once vibrant green rows of boxwoods are reduced to husks after being devoured by the moths’ larvae.
“It is a firm reminder of the fragility and subtle balance of the environment in which we live,” said Sylvain Cuvelier, an entomological researcher who co-authored the first Albanian butterfly atlas.
“It is obviously urgent to unite our efforts to find solutions, to rethink in depth our use of natural resources and the way forward for the protection and restoration of our environment.”


4 Pakistani troops killed while responding to an attack on aid trucks in restive northwest

4 Pakistani troops killed while responding to an attack on aid trucks in restive northwest
Updated 9 sec ago
Follow

4 Pakistani troops killed while responding to an attack on aid trucks in restive northwest

4 Pakistani troops killed while responding to an attack on aid trucks in restive northwest
  • Some security forces were also wounded in the overnight ambush in Kurram
  • No group has claimed responsibility for the latest attacks but suspicion is likely to fall on Sunni militants
PARACHINAR, Pakistan: Militants in Pakistan overnight ambushed security forces who were responding to an earlier attack on aid trucks in the country’s troubled northwest, leading to a shootout in which four troops were killed, officials said Tuesday.
The ambush happened hours after authorities dispatched reinforcements to respond to Monday’s attack on a convoy of aid trucks in which a driver and security official were killed in Kurram, a district in the restive Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province.
Some security forces were also wounded in the overnight ambush in Kurram, where at least 130 people have died in recent months in clashes between rival Shiite and Sunni tribes, officials said. Several trucks that were heading to Parachinar, the main city in Kurram, were looted and burned, authorities said.
Qaiser Abbas, a doctor at a hospital in Parachinar, said they received the bodies of four security forces Monday night from Kurram, where authorities noted a large-scale operation was being planned to try to apprehend the perpetrators of the attacks.
No group has claimed responsibility for the latest attacks but suspicion is likely to fall on Sunni militants.
Shiite Muslims dominate parts of Kurram, although they are a minority in the rest of Pakistan, which is majority Sunni. The area has a history of sectarian conflict, with militant Sunni groups previously targeting minority Shiites.

French envoy: Europe does not want Asia to choose sides in US-China rivalry

French envoy: Europe does not want Asia to choose sides in US-China rivalry
Updated 4 min 17 sec ago
Follow

French envoy: Europe does not want Asia to choose sides in US-China rivalry

French envoy: Europe does not want Asia to choose sides in US-China rivalry
SINGAPORE: The new French ambassador to Singapore said on Monday that France and Europe do not want their Asian partners to have to choose between the United States and China.
Stephen Marchisio, who took office on Tuesday, said France sees increasing pressure, “maybe more on the US side,” that partners in Asia must make a choice.
“It’s very important to say we can talk to everybody,” he said. “We don’t want anyone to choose.”
Marchisio was speaking to journalists at a luncheon in Singapore, where French President Emmanuel Macron will deliver the keynote address on May 31 at Asia’s largest security meeting.
Marchisio said the president will insist during his address that each state in the region can defend its own interests.
“You can do that even if you disagree with the Chinese political model. And you can do that even if you don’t want a military base from the US on your soil,” he said.
The US embassy in Singapore referred questions to the G7 statement signed in Munich by France and the United States, which said all members were committed to “a free, open and secure Indo-Pacific region.”

EUROPE MUST UNITE
Marchisio also said Europe must stand united — including possibly avoiding US weapons purchases — in the wake of incendiary remarks from members of the Trump administration in Munich in recent days.
He said that some countries saw defense-related purchases as a way to gain favor with the US government during the first Trump administration, but that views had changed now, especially after Vice President J.D. Vance’s confrontational comments about Europe in Munich at a security conference.
“What happened in Munich? He tries to attack the very core of democracies,” Marchisio said. “So it triggers another level of questions.”
Now European countries might not buy American military hardware, he continued, because there was no guarantee that doing so would ease US pressure or antagonistic rhetoric.
“We don’t like to say that, but ... we will retaliate if we have to,” he said, referring to tariffs and other US pressure.
Marchisio added that the best-case scenario is that Europe does not need to retaliate, as the United States and European countries have many shared interests and industries.
Singapore defense minister Ng Eng Hen said at the Munich conference that Asia’s image of America had shifted.
“The image has changed from liberator to great disruptor to a landlord seeking rent,” he said.

Russian drone attacks injure mother, two children in central Ukraine, official says

Russian drone attacks injure mother, two children in central Ukraine, official says
Updated 17 min 35 sec ago
Follow

Russian drone attacks injure mother, two children in central Ukraine, official says

Russian drone attacks injure mother, two children in central Ukraine, official says
  • Both Moscow and Kyiv deny targeting civilians in their attacks in the war, that Russia started with its full-scale invasion on Ukraine nearly three years ago.
A Russian overnight drone attack on the city of Dolynska in central Ukraine injured a mother and her two children and forced the evacuation of people from 38 flats after their apartment building was damaged, a regional official said on Tuesday.
“A difficult night for the Kirovohrad region,” Andriy Raikovych, governor of the Kirovohrad region said in a post on the Telegram messaging app. “An enemy drone hit a high-rise building in Dolynska.”
The mother and one of the children were hospitalized, Raikovych added.
He posted photos of flames bursting out of windows of a high-story apartment building.
Reuters could not independently verify the report. There was no immediate comment from Russia.
Both Moscow and Kyiv deny targeting civilians in their attacks in the war, that Russia started with its full-scale invasion on Ukraine nearly three years ago. But thousands of civilians have died in the conflict, the vast majority of them Ukrainian.
The attack took place as top Russian and US officials are meeting in the Saudi Arabia for talks — without the participation of Kyiv or its European allies — on how to end the war in Ukraine.

US, Russian officials to discuss Ukraine war in Saudi Arabia

US, Russian officials to discuss Ukraine war in Saudi Arabia
Updated 29 min 39 sec ago
Follow

US, Russian officials to discuss Ukraine war in Saudi Arabia

US, Russian officials to discuss Ukraine war in Saudi Arabia
  • Ukraine excluded from talks, insists on no agreements without consent
  • US sees talks as test of Russia’s seriousness about ending war

RIYADH: Top US and Russian officials are set to meet on Tuesday in Riyadh for what are expected to be the most significant talks between the two former Cold War foes on ending Moscow’s war in Ukraine.
The conversation could pave the way for a summit between President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin.
The talks come after European leaders gathered in Paris on Monday for an emergency summit to agree a unified strategy after they were blindsided by Trump’s push for immediate talks after a phone call with Putin last week.
The European leaders said they would invest more in defense and take the lead in providing security guarantees for Ukraine.
“Everyone feels the great sense of urgency,” Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof said on X. “At this crucial time for the security of Europe we must continue to stand behind Ukraine.”
“Europe will have to make a contribution toward safeguarding any agreement, and cooperation with the Americans is essential,” he said.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, White House national security adviser Mike Waltz and Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff will meet Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Yuri Ushakov, a foreign policy adviser to Putin, in Riyadh, officials from both sides said.
Initial contact
The meeting comes barely a month after Trump took office and reflects a significant departure from Washington’s position under the administration of President Joe Biden, who eschewed public contacts, concluding that Russia was not serious about ending the war.
Russia, which has occupied parts of Ukraine since 2014, launched a full-scale invasion in February 2022. Trump has vowed to end the war quickly.
Ukraine says no agreements can be made on its behalf in the talks, to which Kyiv was not invited.
US officials sought to cast Tuesday’s talks as an initial contact to determine whether Moscow is serious about ending the war in Ukraine.
“This is a follow-up on that initial conversation between Putin and President Trump about perhaps if that first step is even possible, what the interests are, if this can be managed,” State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce told reporters in Riyadh.
The Kremlin, however, suggested the discussions would cover “the entire complex of Russian-American relations,” as well as preparing for talks on a possible settlement regarding Ukraine and a meeting between the two presidents.
Russia said Lavrov and Rubio in a call on Saturday discussed removing barriers to trade and investment between the two countries.
Then-President Biden and Kyiv’s allies around the world imposed waves of sanctions on Moscow over its invasion of Ukraine three years ago, aimed at weakening the Russian economy and limiting the Kremlin’s war efforts.
On Tuesday, the head of Russia’s sovereign wealth fund said Trump was a problem solver.
“We really see that President Trump and his team is a team of problem solvers, people who have already addressed a number of big challenges very swiftly, very efficiently and very successfully,” Kirill Dmitriev told reporters in Riyadh.
Riyadh, which is also involved in talks with Washington over the future of the Gaza Strip, has played a role in early contacts between the Trump administration and Moscow, helping to secure a prisoner swap last week.
How to engage Washington
It remains unclear how Europe will engage Washington after Trump stunned Ukraine and European allies by calling Putin, long ostracized by the West.
“We agree with President Trump on a “peace through strength” approach,” a European official said after the Paris meeting, speaking on condition of anonymity.
The US decision has sparked a realization among European nations that they will have to do more to ensure Ukraine’s security.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who before the meeting said he was willing to send peacekeeping troops to Ukraine, said on Monday there must be a US security commitment for European countries to put boots on the ground.
Keith Kellogg, Trump’s Ukraine envoy, said he would visit Ukraine from Wednesday and was asked if the US would provide a security guarantee for any European peacekeepers.
“I’ve been with President Trump, and the policy has always been: You take no options off the table,” he said.


European leaders want a say in talks to end Russia’s war in Ukraine

European leaders want a say in talks to end Russia’s war in Ukraine
Updated 41 min 30 sec ago
Follow

European leaders want a say in talks to end Russia’s war in Ukraine

European leaders want a say in talks to end Russia’s war in Ukraine

PARIS: European leaders insisted Monday they must have a say in international talks to end the war in Ukraine despite the clear message from both Washington and Moscow that there was no role for them as yet in negotiations that could shape the future of the continent.
Three hours of emergency talks at the Elysee Palace in Paris left leaders of Germany, the United Kingdom, Italy, Poland, Spain, the Netherlands, Denmark, NATO and the European Union without a common view on possible peacekeeping troops after a US diplomatic blitz on Ukraine last week threw a once-solid trans-Atlantic alliance into turmoil.
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer called for US backing while reaffirming he’s ready to consider sending British forces on the Ukrainian ground alongside others “if there is a lasting peace agreement.”
There was a rift though with some EU nations, like Poland, which have said they don’t want their military imprint on Ukraine soil. Macron was non-committal.
Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof acknowledged the Europeans “need to come to a common conclusion about what we can contribute. And that way we will eventually get a seat at the table,” adding that “just sitting at the table without contributing is pointless.”
Starmer said a trans-Atlantic bond remained essential. “There must be a US backstop, because a US security guarantee is the only way to effectively deter Russia from attacking Ukraine again,” he said.
Top US officials from the Trump administration, on their first visit to Europe last week, left the impression that Washington was ready to embrace the Kremlin while it cold-shouldered many of its age-old European allies.
The US to leave Europe out of negotiations
Gen. Keith Kellogg, Trump’s special envoy for Ukraine and Russia, said Monday he didn’t think it was “reasonable and feasible to have everybody sitting at the table.”
“We know how that can turn out and that has been our point, is keeping it clean and fast as we can,” he told reporters in Brussels, where he briefed the 31 US allies in NATO, along with EU officials, before heading to Kyiv for talks on Wednesday with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
His remarks were echoed by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who was equally dismissive about a role for Europe. “I don’t know what they have to do at the negotiations table,” he said as he arrived in Saudi Arabia for talks with US officials.
Last week, Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in a flurry of speeches questioned both Europe’s security commitments and its fundamental democratic principles.
French President Emmanuel Macron, who has long championed a stronger European defense, said their stinging rebukes and threats of non-cooperation in the face of military danger felt like a shock to the system.
The tipping point came when Trump decided to upend years of US policy by holding talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in hopes of ending the Russia-Ukraine war.
Shortly before the meeting in Paris Monday, Macron spoke with Trump, but Macron’s office would not disclose details about the 20-minute discussion.
Europeans stand by their support to Ukraine
Starmer, who said he will travel to Washington next week to discuss with President Trump “what we see as the key elements of a lasting peace,” appears to be charting a “third way” in Europe’s shifting geopolitical landscape — aligning strategically with the US administration while maintaining EU ties. Some analysts suggest this positioning could allow him to act as a bridge between Trump and Europe, potentially serving as a key messenger to the White House.
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz told reporters a possible peace agreement with Russia cannot be forced on Ukraine. “For us, it must and is clear: This does not mean that peace can be dictated and that Ukraine must accept what is presented to it,” he insisted.
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said that any peace agreement would need to have the active involvement of the EU and Ukraine, so as to not be a false end to the war “as has happened in the past.”
He went on: “What cannot be is that the aggressor is rewarded.”
A strong US component, though, will remain essential for the foreseeable future since it will take many years before many European nations can ratchet up defense production and integrate it into an effective force.
Sending troops after a peace deal?
Highlighting the inconsistencies among many nations about potential troop contributions, Scholz said talk of boots on the ground was “premature.”
“This is highly inappropriate, to put it bluntly, and honestly: we don’t even know what the outcome will be” of any peace negotiation, he added.
European nations are bent though on boosting their armed forces where they can after years of US complaints, and most have increased defense spending to 2 percent of gross domestic product, but the path to reaching 3 percent is unclear.
“The time has come for a much greater ability of Europe to defend itself,” Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk said. “There is unanimity here on the issue of increasing spending on defense. This is an absolute necessity.” Poland spends more than 4 percent of its GDP on defense, more than any other NATO member.